Congregational polity is not the most efficient style of governance. But it does provide the ability to adapt, something needed still today. Conrad Wright, reminds us: So it is a fact of no small consequence that Unitarian Universalists stand in a traditionof congregational polity that is almost four centuries old;… , their congregationalism has proved to be more durable and adaptable [my emphasis] to changing times than any of the doctrinal formulations— whether of God, or human nature, or human destiny—that dominate accounts of the history of liberal religion.[i] Interestingly, Roozen’s research confirms that such structures that optimize “the participatory and relational work of working across diversity are more adaptive than structures that optimize efficiency and control” [ii] So perhaps the very disorganization and inefficiency experience in our congregations and at our national headquarters makes us healthier and more adaptive.
Comments